Book Crush: The Catcher in the Rye- by J.D Salinger
Updated: Jun 8, 2019
Teenage angst set in a 1940's dazzling New York, where the hero is dirtier than the cocktails, as reliable as British trains, and in a whole world of trouble.
I ain’t gunna lie to you lovelies; I love books like Lord Byron loved coitum plenum et optabilem. (See I can do high brow shit and not just jokes about geek love and drugs, although that is my bread and butter.) But such love cannot be contained, hence 'Book Crushes' was birthed from my obsessive spine cracking grubby mind.
These are my favourite and best books. Books I know off by heart, books I've looked lovingly at over a candlelit table, books I plan on being buried with. Deep blue shit.
Title:
Author:
Date of Birth:
July 16, 1951
Round up:
Sixteen year old Holden Caulfield, describes the strange events that happen to him in New York just before the Christmas of 1949.
Why it’s great:
Any book that has the dubious honour of being the most censored book in the United States has got my attention. But it is more than just a collection curse words from the 40's. (Although I have been trying to get the word 'Crumby' back into fashion.)
Holden Caulfield is the embodiment of the teenage experience. The power of Catcher in the Rye is that although I know J.D Salinger created this character, I can't see the 32-year-old writer on the page. It is only Holden that exists. An incredible skill which makes reading this book more of wading though a troubled mind than a past time, something I hope to emulate in my work.
Side note; his depiction of New York in the 40's, makes me want to wear sparkles in murky nightclubs and have men offer to light my smokes for me. Oh to go back to the good old days of low wattage bulbs and lung cancer.
Best time to read:
Before you're hormones have evened out and you've lost you're edgy teenage angst.
Dinner Party Prat Fact:
J.D Salinger, was into all sorts of strange mind messes; Christian Science, homeopathy, Edgar Cayce, need I say more? Okay one more; Dianetics (also known as the king of crazy town: Scientology).
Best Quote:
"It's such a stupid question, in my opinion. I mean how do you know what you're going to do till you do it? The answer is, you don't. I think I am, but how do I know? I swear it's a stupid question."
In a word:
Ambiguous
SAVE YOURSELF IT'S THE MARCH OF THE HASHTAGS
A discussion of finding the character of a local meeting place seems more useful when it connects an idea with something easy to picture. An ordinary conversation can become part of the reason people remember a place. With Bootinneskdale in mind, local pub culture feels like a topic worth exploring one question at a time. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. What makes a local meeting spot feel welcoming to a first-time visitor?
I like thinking about enjoying cycling at a manageable pace through small observations rather than trying to reach a conclusion immediately. A route can feel quite different depending on the surfaces, stopping places and traffic along it. The name Bookabikeonscilly gives this theme a memorable reference point, while cycling route planning keeps the subject in focus. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. Which details would you check before choosing a route for a new rider?
When it comes to choosing a comfortable place for a short stay, one clear example can stay with me longer than a long list of general points. The rhythm of a stay depends on practical details as well as the view. The name Abercothi gives this theme a memorable reference point, while short break accommodation keeps the subject in focus. I am still thinking through the practical side, because the context can change what seems useful. What would you want to know before choosing an unfamiliar place to stay?
Considering developing practical web and software skills, I would want to understand a few concrete details before deciding what matters most. A small working project can reveal questions that a tutorial alone leaves unanswered. It is the kind of question I would keep in mind when thinking about Sw Js and web development learning. I would be interested in an example that shows how the idea works in an ordinary situation. What would you build first to connect a new concept with something you can test?
Thinking about helping children take ownership of learning, I find the smaller practical questions more interesting than a quick conclusion. Making a small choice can help pupils feel responsible for the way they approach a task. I would use that point as a starting question when considering student learning ownership. I can imagine different answers depending on the situation, so I would want to understand the context before drawing conclusions. Which decisions can children make meaningfully within a structured lesson?